An anonymous contributor sent us these photos, taken from a repeater site in Western Idaho. This is a classic example of how some hams just don’t know how to work with radio equipment. This co-located site donated some of it’s space to the local ham club to put up a 70cm repeater…. this repeater operated fine until a windstorm hit. The only casualties was the club’s UHF folded dipoles (the remaining one seen dangling on top of the VHF dipole) and what’s left of the solar panel array. Unfortunatley, a combination of ice loading and poor mounting quickly took the ham repeater (and probably some of the other customers on the site) off of the air. Click on the photos to see them in their frosty fullness.
Site Links
Archives
- December 2017
- July 2016
- November 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- September 2013
- May 2013
- July 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- June 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- June 2010
- May 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
three little characters: R56
Otherwise it’s just just amatuer radio!
Ty-wraps and duct tape GIT ER DONE!
Oh, and I’m partial to the term ENTHUSIAST RADIO
What is “R56” ?
Standards and Guidelines for Communications Sites.
Motorola Publication # 68P81089E50-A. Every little mind-numbing detail you need to know on setting a TX/RX site. Includes NFPA 70, NFPA 101, and a bunch of OSHA stuff by reference.
The Anti-HamSexy Installation Guide
“Oh, and I’m partial to the term ENTHUSIAST RADIO”
Half of us can’t spell amateur correctly. Now you want to go and have us add a syllable?
What is so bad about amateur? Is it due to the suggestion that we are unskilled?
We are called amateurs due to the fact that we are unpaid, not unskilled. How about dropping a syllable?
Unpaid Radio. “I’m an Unpaid Radio Operator” vs. “I’m an Enthusiast Radio Operator”.
I think Unpaid rolls off the tongue a little easier and would get us better deals at estate sales.
As for R 56, I would not mind having a copy. Other than paying for it (I’m an Unpaid Radio Operator) how would I get a recent one?
I think it’s a little extreme to fault amateurs (and I hate ham radio very much) for that site failure. That’s a lot of weight on those towers. Add a little wind and something was bound to happen.
I wonder how they fixed the solar panel array? Very delicate…you can’t just smash the ice off with a hammer.
it took years for our repeater crew to get some respect among site owners. if we hadn’t all come from the commercial 2-way and commercial wireless fields, we may never have gotten away from looking hamsexy.
i’ve seen things on mountain tops over the years, done by hams, that have made me cringe. them doing things the “wrong” way isn’t just due to lack of experience, but many times it’s due to pure cheapness.
hamsexy: when the HF rig costs more than the 30 foot 1979 motorhome it’s installed in.
-g-
I think it’s a little extreme to fault amateurs (and I hate ham radio very much) for that site failure. That’s a lot of weight on those towers. Add a little wind and something was bound to happen.
According to our source, only the ham-installed equipment failed.
Was the PV array ground-mounted or did it tear off the roof & land on the ground? Either way, several thousand dollrs of PV cells mounted with inferior hardware…
“Amateur” is not necessarily a negative term.
As a LEO, I’ve been “enforcing” the law for many
years while it’s said that doctors and lawyers
“practice” at their professions.
The UHF antenna looks like a DB408. Here are the
specs:
http://www.wiscointl.com/decibel/dipoles/db408.htm
I’ve seen many similar failures of commercial customer’s equipment at sites where ham stuff survived just fine. Without seeing how things were mounted when not covered in ice it’s hard to judge.
I can certainly see why so many “Hams” get a frosty reception!
IGD:
Booooo
What happens when you let hams on your tower.
Yes there was at least one ham repeater on there. From insight gained from this post I’m guessing the ham repeater was likely the cause.
“KMAB TV Chief Engineer Oscar Lamumbabumba says the 500 foot tower and its guy wires were caked with several inches of ice that possibly led to the collapse at 7:43 p.m.”
Now I know that I am “just a ham” but does that strike anyone else as a DUH comment?
I mean come on, only SEVERAL INCHES of ice, that could not be the cause.
This calls for a “KMAB Inside Investigation”. We can get the FCC, FBI, CIA, NSA, FAA, NSTB, OHSA, ARES, ARRL, REACT, SKYWARN, and our crack investigative reporter Ima Beatenoff on the case.
Just my two cents.
—————————————————————
The above story is fictional, any resemblance to any person, TV station, goverment agency and/or Wackergroup is purely coincidental. all rights reserved. ect ect, blah blah blah.
I don’t know…I’ve seen “commercial two-way” companies put up some cheesy stuff, so it cuts both ways. Especially when the client is of the “open pocketbook, throw money at the problem, never come to the site” type.
There’s only one tech around here that I trust with my radios and he works for the railroad. If he screws up, he’s fired. If the local-yokel commercial two-way tech screws up, he just gets more billable hours…
The problem here was the fact that the UHF dipoles were top-mounted on that tower. Note that none of the other, larger windload vhf antennas are/were top mounted.
Also why the heck are they using such a high-gain antenna on the top of a hill like that? Up there you dont want antennas that cut so hard into the horizon, or you will get a nice dead spot below the repeater, where 90% of your users are. A nice 2 dipole array would have worked better, and would not have failed.
The solar panels, I have no idea about as I can not see how they were mounted.
The club who is at that site is in financial trouble.
Just ask how much is left in the clubs budget after spending thousands on batteries at that site and other foolish decisions. The site is shared with the National Guard. A long time ago, the club volunteered to build the repeater building. IMHO, that club is at fault. That club used to be financially fit and careful on what was spent on which projects. By-laws were changed so that club directors could make decisions without approval from the general club membership. Since then, they have had so many hands in the cookie jar taking funds for dumb projects. For example, This club paid someone to remove an old telephone pole used as a tower. The person who was paid to remove the pole, took the money and ran.
Now each net they hold, and club meeting is just like a Public Television telethon. It’s a shame that once a great club has been reduced to that.
THATS CRAP. I NEED TO KNOW HOO
rushfan is.DO YOU HAVE THE BALLS TO TELL ME.
Way to be on the ball, LOWBANDRADIOMAN…. only a year too late in jumping into the conversation….